02|2025
Introduction
If you’ve been pulled over for suspected drunk driving in Phoenix, the officer may have asked you to perform a series of field sobriety tests. These tests, designed to measure your balance, coordination, and ability to follow instructions, are often used as evidence in DUI cases. However, field sobriety tests are not always accurate, and many factors can lead to false or misleading results.
A skilled drunk driving attorney in Phoenix can challenge the validity of these tests and potentially weaken the prosecution’s case against you. This article will explain how field sobriety tests work, why they can be unreliable, and how an experienced DUI lawyer can dispute their accuracy in court.
Understanding Field Sobriety Tests
Field sobriety tests (FSTs) are a set of physical and cognitive exercises that law enforcement officers use to determine whether a driver is impaired. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has approved three standardized field sobriety tests:
- Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Test – The officer asks the driver to follow an object (such as a pen or flashlight) with their eyes while looking for involuntary jerking movements.
- Walk-and-Turn Test – The driver must take nine steps heel-to-toe along a straight line, turn, and return the same way while following instructions.
- One-Leg Stand Test – The driver is required to stand on one leg while counting aloud for approximately 30 seconds.
These tests are used to establish probable cause for a DUI arrest, but they are far from foolproof.
Reasons Field Sobriety Tests Can Be Challenged
While officers rely on field sobriety tests to assess impairment, many factors can lead to inaccurate results. A knowledgeable DUI lawyer can use these flaws to challenge the prosecution’s evidence.
1. Field Sobriety Tests Are Subjective
Unlike breath or blood tests, which provide numerical results, field sobriety tests are based on an officer’s judgment. This means that personal bias, improper training, or misinterpretation can play a role in the outcome.
2. Medical Conditions Can Affect Performance
Many medical conditions, including neurological disorders, ear infections, or even past injuries, can make it difficult for a person to balance or perform the required movements correctly. A DUI lawyer can argue that a physical limitation—not intoxication—caused poor test performance.
3. Anxiety and Stress Can Lead to Poor Performance
Being stopped by police is an intimidating experience. Anxiety, nervousness, or the pressure of being observed can cause even a sober person to stumble or forget instructions.
4. Poor Road and Weather Conditions
Field sobriety tests are often conducted on the side of the road, where uneven pavement, poor lighting, and traffic noise can interfere with a driver’s ability to perform the tasks accurately. Wind, rain, or extreme temperatures can also affect performance.
5. Improper Police Procedures
Officers must follow strict guidelines when administering field sobriety tests. If they fail to give clear instructions, conduct the tests incorrectly, or fail to account for other factors, their findings can be challenged in court.
Legal Strategies for Challenging Field Sobriety Tests
A DUI lawyer in Phoenix can use several legal strategies to dispute the results of field sobriety tests and weaken the prosecution’s case.
1. Questioning the Officer’s Training and Experience
Not all officers are properly trained in administering field sobriety tests. Your attorney may request documentation of the officer’s training and challenge whether they followed the correct procedures.
2. Introducing Evidence of Medical Conditions
If you have a medical condition that affects balance or coordination, your lawyer can present medical records or expert testimony to prove that the test results were unreliable.
3. Highlighting Environmental Factors
If the tests were conducted on uneven ground, in bad weather, or under poor lighting conditions, your attorney can argue that these factors contributed to poor performance rather than alcohol impairment.
4. Challenging the Officer’s Observations
Since field sobriety test results are based on the officer’s subjective judgment, your lawyer can cross-examine the officer in court and challenge inconsistencies in their testimony.
5. Using Video Evidence
Many police vehicles are equipped with dashboard cameras that record traffic stops. Your attorney can review video footage to determine whether the officer administered the tests correctly or if there were any environmental or situational issues that affected the results.
How a DUI Lawyer Can Help Reduce or Dismiss Charges
Successfully challenging field sobriety tests can weaken the prosecution’s case against you. If your attorney can prove that the tests were unreliable, the court may dismiss them as evidence. This can lead to reduced charges or even a case dismissal.
A DUI lawyer can also negotiate with the prosecution for lesser penalties, such as community service or alcohol education programs, rather than harsh fines and jail time. In some cases, they may be able to get your charges dropped entirely.
Conclusion
Field sobriety tests are often used as key evidence in DUI cases, but they are far from reliable. Many factors, including medical conditions, stress, and poor testing conditions, can lead to false results. A skilled DUI lawyer in Phoenix can challenge these tests and potentially weaken the prosecution’s case against you.
If you have been arrested for a DUI based on field sobriety test results, do not assume that the evidence against you is solid. Contact an experienced DUI attorney who can evaluate your case, challenge the validity of the tests, and fight for the best possible outcome.
Categories:: Blog